[Windmill-dev] JS test suite or test setup/teardown
Travis Vachon
travis at osafoundation.org
Tue Dec 11 14:43:35 PST 2007
>
>
> That's all I really have to say about setup/teardown and
> dependencies. I do want to reiterate my strong opposition to an
> option that runs setup always or once, setup should only be run once
> for the existing session no matter what.
+1
I think that what Matthew is looking for (sharing initialization code)
is better handled by a dependency system.
The rest of this sounds like it would fit the bill very well.
As far as naming schemes go I'm partial to:
testModule.setup()
testModule.test_a()
testModule.test_b()
testModule.teardown()
-Travis
More information about the Windmill-dev
mailing list