mde at osafoundation.org
Wed Aug 29 12:45:02 PDT 2007
Here's a first stab at what's needed:
Pretty obvious stuff, I think.
Mikeal Rogers wrote:
> Well, any test authoring library needs a test framework. The JSUnit
> framework seems like as good a one as any so we might as well just use
> it since it's already defined. The only "extra" work would be
> implementing all the assertBlah functions in the jum object to call the
> windmill reporting mechanism discussed earlier, that way any existing
> JSUnit tests would be able to run. The functions in the jum.controller
> namespace shouldn't need to be wrapped in jum.assert statements by a
> test author, they should call all the reporting mechanisms on their own.
> If you want to start on a wiki page proposal for this work that would be
> awesome. You don't need to define all the changes you'll make to the IDE
> "guts", just outline the public API you'll be writing for test authors
> and we can work together on defining all the service calls and command
> line options you'll need.
> Windmill-dev mailing list
> Windmill-dev at osafoundation.org
More information about the Windmill-dev