[pylucene-dev] What has happened to PyLucene?
janssen at parc.com
Thu Jan 15 09:02:59 PST 2009
Erik Groeneveld <erik at cq2.nl> wrote:
> But I admit that after the major
> strategy change that involved using JCC instead of GCJ, I am switching
> to a different GCJ solution. Probably other do so as well?
Nope. I dislike the JVM, particularly its handling of memory, so I
share your pain, but the Lucene folks are moving to Java 1.5, and the
gcj folks don't seem to be keeping up. The JCC-based approach seems to
be robust (if you can stand sharing the Python process space with the
JVM), and has a path to the future of Lucene. So I'm going to keep
using JCC PyLucene with UpLib.
More information about the pylucene-dev