[pylucene-dev] Pylucene 2.1.0-2, Python 2.5, Win32
Krys Wilken
kryswilken at gmail.com
Wed May 30 20:12:18 PDT 2007
Hi Andi,
Okay, I successfully compiled with your mingw 3.4.6. Same 2 failed tests, so
no probs.
I have made the archive available here:
http://dev.krys.ca/downloads/PyLucene/PyLucene-2.1.0-2-gcj346-py25-win32.zip
(Notice the gcj version) :)
As before, feel free to link to it.
I also need to make x86, x86_64 and FreeBSD 5.4/5.5 compiles. :( Believe it
or not, I need them all for personal and professional use. O_o I will make
them available too as I get them working.
One question: Can I use 3.4.6 on x86_64? Or do I have to mess with 4.x? My
initial attempts with 4.x gets me failed tests.
Hope this all helps. Thanks for the help.
Krys
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 21:49, Andi Vajda wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007, Krys Wilken wrote:
> > I just blindly did what the INSTALL file said. So I got my gcj (and gcc,
> > etc) from:
> >
> > http://prdownloads.sf.net/mingw/gcc-java-3.4.2-20040916-1.tar.gz
> >
> > I am happy to try your 3.4.6 build as soon as I get a chance.
>
> Sure, no need to but if you do it, it's better since the gcj is newer.
> I remember that 3.4.2 is the earliest rev that anyone should use. Newer
> 3.4.x are better. Newer 4.x are iffy. Older 3.4.x have problems.
>
> > Maybe an update to INSTALL is in order. I have already noticed
> > references to 3.4.6 in the Makefile, so it's kind of like getting
> > conflicting information. Just a thought.
>
> Yes, that'd be good. This whole compiler business is rather hairy,
> inconsistent across platforms and a pain to maintain.
>
> > As for a 4.x. I have not probs trying it, but I am certainly not
> > qualified to debug it and make it sane, as you say. My Java and C and
> > compiling in general are very rusty. They were all killed by a Python.
> > ;D (Well, no... actually they were killed by my agreeing to take a job
> > maintaining other people's brain dead VB code. I've probably gotten
> > stupider because of it.) :(
>
> No worries. Compiling gcj for Windows is really for the masochist. No point
> in trying it unless you have a special interest in doing it. I'd love for
> someone to volunteer as my pain threshhold is kind of low in the
> building-gcj area these days. GCJ on Windows isn't exactly actively
> maintained either.
>
> Building gcj on Windows requires tracking down the correct build
> information, the correct people with that info, having a Linux box to
> cross-compile it on, having the time to watch gcj build, over and over as
> you make simple stupid mistakes in the many steps required to cross-compile
> it, and then finally debug it with no debugger.
>
> > Anyway, since the gcj version info is important, I will add it to the
> > file name and README_FISRT.txt file I added. I'll let you know when it's
> > done. You might want to hold off on the link until it's done.
>
> Great, let me know when you're ready.
>
> Andi..
> _______________________________________________
> pylucene-dev mailing list
> pylucene-dev at osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
More information about the pylucene-dev
mailing list