Fwd: Re[2]: [pylucene-dev] PyLucy ?

[Jack L]

Sorry, I meant Andi - I can't type.

===8<==============Original message text===============
Hello Andi,

> I'm afraid that going the Lucy route is the same tradeoff: a port, diverging
> from Java Lucene, with its own set of bugs, always behind Lucene core
> development.

Well understood.

> Lucy, however, is written in C and could gain significant momentum by serving
> as a base for all other such wrapper ports (Python, Ruby, Perl, Lisp, etc...)

> Time should tell...

Lucy's author said in Lucy list that it won't be available until
a few months later. So yeah, we'll see.

BTW David, is there a list of classes that PyLucene didn't implement?
For example, is CJKAnalyzer available in PyLucene?

Jack


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com