[pylucene-dev] Build on solaris
vajda at osafoundation.org
Mon Jul 3 08:42:40 PDT 2006
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Zhang, Zhishuang wrote:
> I am using this file: "../src/PyLucene-src-2.0.0.tar.gz" from the
>From your earlier message, you're probably using this one:
(it shows rev 417135 for the Lucene svn rev and that's the most recent
Lucene used with PyLucene builds). Try actually using:
to see if that solves it. If it does the the dates in the 2.0.0-1 tar archive
are wrong (and I need to fix this).
You shouldn't have to edit anything except for the variables documented in
> I only uncomment the variable definition section in Makefile. Seems like
> there is more I need to modify in order to skip the patching phase.
> Anyone can give me a hand here.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pylucene-dev-bounces at osafoundation.org
> [mailto:pylucene-dev-bounces at osafoundation.org] On Behalf Of Andi Vajda
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 11:13 AM
> To: pylucene-dev at osafoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [pylucene-dev] Build on solaris
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Zhang, Zhishuang wrote:
>> I got a message below, and don't what to do. Anyone saw this message
>> mkdir -p release/classes
>> cd lucene-java-2.0.0-417135; patch -Nup1 < ../patches.lucene; echo ok
>> Looks like a unified context diff.
>> File to patch: patches.lucene
>> No file found -- skip this patch? [no]
>> File to patch:
> If you build PyLucene from the source tarball, you shouldn't have to go
> through this patching phase. The Lucene .java source files are already
> compiled and the .jar files are provided with the PyLucene source
> The problem you're facing is probably due to dates of some of these
> being wrong and that is confusing make.
> pylucene-dev mailing list
> pylucene-dev at osafoundation.org
More information about the pylucene-dev