[pylucene-dev] FreeBSD-6.0 Segmentation Fault

David Pratt fairwinds at eastlink.ca
Thu Aug 3 12:15:09 PDT 2006


Hi tsuraan. I am not really sure what is going on if 1.0.1 will work 
while 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 will not. Should they not all fail if this were 
the case? For me this is more about getting a newer release of PyLucene 
working since 1.0.1 seemed to work fine on FreeBSD 4.10 with gcc41 for 
me and also reported to work on FreeBSD 4.11 fine by another person.

I can give this a try for sure. gcc34 is available in ports collection. 
I think gcj was only set up for 4.1 ports. I have been commenting out the

WITHOUT_JAVA = yes

in the port Makefile for gcc41 to build with java

Did you keep any notes for your gcc34 build that you could share. Do you 
a newer PyLucene version than 1.0.1 running on FreeBSD 5.x or 6.x? Many 
thanks

Regards
David

tsuraan at tsuraan.net wrote:
>> Hmm. Went back to my FreeBSD-4.10 installation and tried installing 
>> 1.9.1 and ran into the same trouble. I'll try 1.0.1 on FreeBSD-6. I 
>> would be willing to bet it will work but this does not appear so great 
>> for the two newer releases :-(
> 
> When I was trying to get things running under FreeBSD and gcc-4.x, I had 
> the following conversation with the gcj devs (link to my initial 
> posting): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-02/msg00004.html .  It looks 
> like exception handling is hosed under FreeBSD and gcc-4.x, so maybe 
> that's giving you trouble.  I had aborts rather than segmentation 
> faults, but the moral of the story seems to be that you really want to 
> use gcc-3.4.x and not the 4 series.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pylucene-dev mailing list
> pylucene-dev at osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/pylucene-dev
> 


More information about the pylucene-dev mailing list