[ietf-calsify] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2447bis-06.txt

[Reinhold Kainhofer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2009 13:19:17 schrieb Alexey Melnikov:
> Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:
> >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >directories.
[...]
> There were only minor changes in this version, namely changing the
> reference to RFC 2822 to point to RFC 5322, and updated boilerplate.


I see that none of my comments (sent almost a year ago) for the bis-05 draft 
have been incorporated:
http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/Computing/Review_RFC2447bis_2008-10.pdf
http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/Computing/Review_RFC2447bis_2008-10.html

Among other things, most examples in the draft (also in this bis-06 version) 
are vCalendar rather than iCalendar files. This means:

- -) filename="event.vcs", i.e. vcs file extension is used
- -) PROFILE:REQUEST, PROFILE-VERSION:1.0 used
- -) due dates of the wrong form    DUE:19970701T090000-0700
- -) ATTSTAT attribute instead of PARTSTAT used: 
ATTENDEE;ROLE=CHAIR;ATTSTAT=ACCEPTED:mailto:foo1 at example.com
- -) STATUS:NEEDS ACTION instead of STATUS:NEEDS-ACTION

Also, the draft speaks of the mime-type "multiple/alternative". Does this 
mime-type exist at all? Or should it rather be "multipart/alternative"?

Cheers,
Reinhold
- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinhold at kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKqOn6TqjEwhXvPN0RAsRkAKCJzhaCBQ6EheQ9ratkx3oi8O97HACcD/yW
Bla3TsFHadObXY+H+lDo70I=
=ihfG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----