[ietf-calsify] comments on draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2447bis-07.txt

Eliot Lear lear at cisco.com
Wed Oct 21 05:16:15 PDT 2009


<Chair hat off>

Thanks, Alexey, for putting out this draft.  I have some questions and 
comments about the latest draft.  Most of these are nits.

In Section 2.4 you write:

> Note 1: A MIME message containing multiple iCalendar objects with
>     different method values must be further encapsulated with a
>     "multipart/mixed" MIME entity.

Do you mean MUST instead of must?

In Section 3, Security Considerations, as others have pointed out, time 
has passed, and it probably is not reasonably to only mention RFC 1847.  
However, I think we should probably go further and recommend the use of 
our own standards such as DKIM.  Having some understanding of trust 
boundaries seems to me important at this stage.  While 1847 would 
provide strong trust, it's nowhere near as used as, say, DKIM or SPF.  
I'm not saying do away, with 1847 text, but I think we have some text to 
add.


On encoding, I wonder if this is best left to the basic MIME / SMTP 
encoding practices.  Do we really need to discuss 7 or 8 bit here?  Is 
this a serious problem that someone has had?

Nit: your draft has the word FORMFEED where formfeeds should be.

Nit: Section 2.3 is entitled [RFC-5322] Addresses.  I would prefer to 
see a common name such as "Email addresses".  Let's face it.  We 
probably haven't seen the last of updates to this standard, for better 
or worse, and unless you think you are normatively referencing a 
definition of "email addresses" that is likely to change, I don't see 
the point of obscuring what we're talking about.

Nit: Section 1.2.  Is it me or is this section excessive?  I agree with 
the 2119 langauge, but do we need to go to the lengths of the following:

>     Properties defined by [iCAL] are referred to with capitalized,
>     quoted-strings of text, followed by the word "property". For example,
>     "ATTENDEE" property refers to the iCalendar property used to convey
>     the calendar address of a calendar user.
>    

Ok, I haven't checked your examples.  That will be next.

Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-calsify/attachments/20091021/953512b5/attachment.htm 


More information about the ietf-calsify mailing list