[ietf-calsify] RK-iTIP-100 (related to iCalendar issue 27) [Was: Re: Issue RK-1 in rfc2445bis-08 (related to issue 37) [Was: IETF Review of the RFC 2446bis-07 (iTIP) draft]]
cyrus at daboo.name
Fri Oct 17 07:21:46 PDT 2008
--On October 17, 2008 10:04:55 AM -0400 Bernard Desruisseaux
<bernard.desruisseaux at oracle.com> wrote:
> Section 18.104.22.168 Calculating due dates in recurring VTODOs should be
> removed from rfc2446bis (iTIP). The first sentence is actually wrong.
> The due date is NOT ``specified using the "RECURRENCE-ID" property''.
> You are correct in saying that this information belongs in rfc2445bis.
> That being said, I don't believe any text change is required in
> rfc2445bis (iCalendar). I think the modification that was done to the
> last paragraph of the Description field of the RRULE property in section
> 22.214.171.124 Recurrence Rule (issue 27) is sufficient. See:
I agree that 126.96.36.199 in 2446bis is redundant and I have removed it from my
working copy of the draft.
More information about the ietf-calsify