[ietf-calsify] RK-iTIP-100 (related to iCalendar issue 27) [Was: Re: Issue RK-1 in rfc2445bis-08 (related to issue 37) [Was: IETF Review of the RFC 2446bis-07 (iTIP) draft]]

[Cyrus Daboo]

Hi Bernard,

--On October 17, 2008 10:04:55 AM -0400 Bernard Desruisseaux 
<bernard.desruisseaux at oracle.com> wrote:

> Section 4.5.7.2 Calculating due dates in recurring VTODOs should be
> removed from rfc2446bis (iTIP). The first sentence is actually wrong.
> The due date is NOT ``specified using the "RECURRENCE-ID" property''.
> You are correct in saying that this information belongs in rfc2445bis.
>
> That being said, I don't believe any text change is required in
> rfc2445bis (iCalendar). I think the modification that was done to the
> last paragraph of the Description field of the RRULE property in section
> 3.8.5.3 Recurrence Rule (issue 27) is sufficient.  See:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-08#page-126

I agree that 4.5.7.2 in 2446bis is redundant and I have removed it from my 
working copy of the draft.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo