[ietf-calsify] Issue RK-1 in rfc2445bis-08 (related to issue 37) [Was: IETF Review of the RFC 2446bis-07 (iTIP) draft]

[Cyrus Daboo]

Hi Reinhold,

--On October 17, 2008 1:43:52 AM +0200 Reinhold Kainhofer 
<reinhold at kainhofer.com> wrote:

>> In what use case during scheduling is the start of the event being
>> scheduled not relevant and not necessary?
>
> When sending a REFRESH or DECLINECOUNTER message, it contains a VEVENT
> with  only the UID, but no specific further information (after all, you
> ask the  organizer for the latest version, so you don't have to send any
> of your  outdated information, including DTSTART).

Also CANCEL - all that is needed to cancel a meeting is the 
UID/RECURRENCE-ID.


-- 
Cyrus Daboo