[Ietf-calsify] IETF Review of rfc2446bis-07

[Bernard Desruisseaux]

s/"VEVENTS"/"VEVENT" calendar components/

Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. September 2008 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
>> Here is my review, where I mention all issues / questions sequentially,
>> ordered as they appear in the draft (thus mixing errors with open questions
>> and suggestings).
> 
> I just noticed one more minor issue:
> In section "4.4.7 Add A New Series of Instances To A Recurring Event" we use 
>>> (they are both "VEVENTS")<<. As I didn't find any other instance where 
> VEVENT is pluralized (Actually, in rfc 2447bis, there is a splot where VEVENT 
> is explictly used where a plural is expected, see the bottom of p.7 of 
> rfc2447bis-07), I don't think we should do it here, either. I think it's best 
> to always stay with VEVENT in its singular form. Thus, I would change this to 
>>> (they are both a "VEVENT")<<
> 
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
>