[Ietf-calsify] Re: AD review issue #1: Use of ALTREP

Eliot Lear lear at cisco.com
Sat Jun 28 07:18:13 PDT 2008


Am I correct in that this issue is to be resolved as below?  Are there 
any objections?

Eliot

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Aki Niemi wrote:
>
>> May I suggest an alternative approach? Since the list of "known" uses of
>> ALTREP can actually be narrowed down to about three, I think we should
>> add to the definition of each of these properties exactly what it means
>> to receive one with the ALTREP parameter that contains an HTTP URL.
>> Other URIs permitted, but their meaning is undefined. In other words,
>> document current practice as much as we can, but keep further uses open.
>>
>> And then to ALTREP parameter, add the description you propose, as
>> generic advice to how the parameter should be handled/used.
>
> +1
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-calsify mailing list
> Ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify
>



More information about the Ietf-calsify mailing list