cyrus at daboo.name
Sun Dec 14 17:35:50 PST 2008
--On December 14, 2008 11:52:46 AM +0100 Petr Tomasek <tomasek at etf.cuni.cz>
>> Section 5.1 states the UID component [sic] is identical to RFC 2445;
>> however the examples show a VENUE-ID property. Should it be UID or
> BTW, why to define a new component and not just adopt the vCard standard?
Actually the VVENUE draft is pretty old and current thinking in CalConnect
is to actually do what you suggest and opt for VCARD. This makes more sense
now that the vCard v4.0 effort is underway and they have defined a new KIND
property that makes it easier to identify a card as being for a venue, or
something other than a person.
More information about the ietf-calsify