[Ietf-calsify] rfc 2446 - Cancel and sequence number

[Eliot Lear]

Arnaud Quillaud wrote:
> The rules for incrementing the SEQUENCE are still defined in the calsify draft at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis-06#section-3.8.7.4
>
> Shouldn't those be removed from there (if it is not too late) 

This sounds right to me, and no it's not too late.  The one group of 
changes we said we would allow to RFC 2445bis would be those arising 
from changes to the other documents, and in particular iTIP.

> Arnaud Quillaud
>
> PS: the current Sun Calendar Server is probably not a good example in terms of implementation as it bumps up the seq number for pretty much any change.
>   

Does it present a change to a user?  If so, that must be frustrating.

Eliot