[Ietf-calsify] 3.3.10. Recurrence Rule - typo or ambiguity?

[Bernard Desruisseaux]

Mike Samuel wrote:
> Doesn't
>  "Furthermore, the BYDAY rule part
>      MUST NOT be specified with a numeric value with the FREQ rule part
>      set to YEARLY when the BYWEEKNO rule part is specified"
> conflict with
>  "The
>      numeric value in a BYDAY rule part with the FREQ rule part set to
>      YEARLY ...
>      when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are present."
> ?
> 
> Other than that, the original wording makes more sense to me.  It's
> saying that numeric BYDAY's are treated as weeks within the year when
> you've already specified a week within the month or you're filtering
> by month.
> 
> It would be nice if it specified what BYDAY meant where FREQ=YEARLY
> and none of (BYMONTH,BYWEEKNO,BYYEARDAY are present, so I would prefer
> the last line read
> 
>  "when the BYMONTH rule part is not present".

+1

As I mentionned in my last mail, I had missed the "not".
Furthermore, there is no need to mention BYWEEKNO here
since the other statement forbids its use in this context.

BTW, I don't consider issue 11 fully closed.  During the
last Jabber session we didn't go through all of Nigel's
comment.

Thanks,
Bernard

> 
> Specifically, I still don't see
>  RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1MO
> fully specified.
> 
> mike
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/07/07, Andrew N Dowden <andrew_dowden at softdesign.net.nz> wrote:
>> 3.3.10.  Recurrence Rule
>>
>>           .. The
>>       numeric value in a BYDAY rule part with the FREQ rule part set to
>>       YEARLY corresponds to an offset within the month when the BYMONTH
>>       rule part is present, and corresponds to an offset within the year
>>       when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are present.
>>
>> Should the last line read?:
>>
>>      .. BYWEEKNO or BYMONTHDAY rule parts ..
>> or
>>     .. BYWEEKNO or BYYEARDAY rule parts ..
>>
>> Alternatively, does this make sense as is?
>>
>> -- 
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>   SoftDesign Group
>>   Dowden Software Associates
>>   P O Box 31 132, Lower Hutt 5040, NEW ZEALAND
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-calsify mailing list
>> Ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-calsify mailing list
> Ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify