[Ietf-calsify] 3.3.10. Recurrence Rule - typo or ambiguity?
bernard.desruisseaux at oracle.com
Wed Jul 11 18:34:50 PDT 2007
Ouch! I omited a single little word in the last sentence...
when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are *** NOT *** present.
Andrew N Dowden wrote:
> 3.3.10. Recurrence Rule
> .. The
> numeric value in a BYDAY rule part with the FREQ rule part set to
> YEARLY corresponds to an offset within the month when the BYMONTH
> rule part is present, and corresponds to an offset within the year
> when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are present.
> Should the last line read?:
> .. BYWEEKNO or BYMONTHDAY rule parts ..
> .. BYWEEKNO or BYYEARDAY rule parts ..
> Alternatively, does this make sense as is?
More information about the Ietf-calsify