[Ietf-calsify] 3.3.10. Recurrence Rule - typo or ambiguity?

[Bernard Desruisseaux]

Ouch!  I omited a single little word in the last sentence...

when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are *** NOT *** present.

Sorry!

Thanks,
Bernard

Andrew N Dowden wrote:
> 3.3.10.  Recurrence Rule
> 
>           .. The
>       numeric value in a BYDAY rule part with the FREQ rule part set to
>       YEARLY corresponds to an offset within the month when the BYMONTH
>       rule part is present, and corresponds to an offset within the year
>       when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are present.
> 
> Should the last line read?:
> 
>      .. BYWEEKNO or BYMONTHDAY rule parts ..
> or
>     .. BYWEEKNO or BYYEARDAY rule parts ..
> 
> Alternatively, does this make sense as is?
>