[Ietf-calsify] Re: Should we bring back the RANGE parameter?

Reinhold Kainhofer reinhold at kainhofer.com
Wed Jul 4 13:19:45 PDT 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 schrieb Cyrus Daboo:
> Hi Bernard,
>
> --On July 4, 2007 11:46:33 AM -0400 Bernard Desruisseaux
>
> <bernard.desruisseaux at oracle.com> wrote:
> > At the last Jabber session you said you were tempted to bring back the
> > RANGE parameter to allow an Organizer to cancel all future recurrence
> > instances of a recurring component defined with an unbounded RRULE.

Apart from the technical issues and the semantics, looking at a practical 
point: 
How many calendaring applications and server have implemented or might be 
using the RANGE concept now or in the future?

Cheers,
Reinhold


- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: reinhold at kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
 * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGjADkTqjEwhXvPN0RAonEAJ9X9qxFkQ+GeFXObNhtXVWhG2meawCgjtLs
Ubowh1UbRCUv96CYVSDsYQA=
=RJpU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Ietf-calsify mailing list