[Ietf-calsify] [issue] when BY extends past last occurrence
lear at ofcourseimright.com
Tue Jun 13 00:01:39 PDT 2006
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> -) Section 4.3.10 says:
> "If BYxxx rule part values are found which are beyond the available
> scope (ie, BYMONTHDAY=30 in February), they are simply ignored."
> Here an example should be given (what the available scope is and what ignored
> means here). E.g.
> DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Vienna: 20050201T120000
> results in occurrences on 1 Feb 2006, 30 May 2006, 30 Aug 2006, 30 Nov 2006,
> 30 May 2006.
> I.e. "they are simply ignored" means that the whole occurrence is ignored, not
> the rule part value (which would result in the day being taken from the
> DTSTART) .
So what is needed here is a normative clarification of what is ignored.
Do you have some preferred text you would like to propose?
More information about the Ietf-calsify