[Ietf-calsify] Section 4.1 Content Lines: x-name

[Tim Hare]

Bilateral agreement between which two parties? 


Tim Hare
Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-calsify-bounces at osafoundation.org
[mailto:ietf-calsify-bounces at osafoundation.org] On Behalf Of Jay Batson
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 11:45 PM
To: Bernard Desruisseaux
Cc: Calsify WG
Subject: Re: [Ietf-calsify] Section 4.1 Content Lines: x-name

On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:37 PM, Bernard Desruisseaux wrote:

> In section 4.1 Content Lines of RFC 2445 it says:
>
> > x-name             = "X-" [vendorid "-"] 1*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "-")
> > ; Reservered for experimental use. Not intended for use in ; 
> > released products.
>
> The comment for x-name is in contradiction with the text in section
> 4.8.8.1 Non-standard Properties as well as the text in section 7.2 
> Registration of New Properties.
>
> New text proposed:
>
> > x-name             = "X-" [vendorid "-"] 1*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "-")
> > ; Reserved for non-standard names. Can be used by bilateral ; 
> > agreement.

+1

-------------
Jay Batson
batsonjay at plumcanary.com
+1-978-824-0111 (w)
+1-978-758-1599 (m)


_______________________________________________
Ietf-calsify mailing list
Ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify