[Ietf-calsify] xCal - time to submit?
aki.niemi at nokia.com
Sat Oct 22 09:13:45 PDT 2005
Nevertheless, your original message had calsify WG in the To header field.
My reply was simply a reminder, that that particular IETF WG (being the
only active IETF WG addressed) is not responsible for this work, and
that any submission of xCal to the IESG is by an *individual* and not
endorsed by the working group. That's all.
ext Doug Royer wrote:
> I may have forgot to set the REPLY-TO the xCal mailing list.
> Often others overrode or ignored that.
> And we have to post announcements to all related lists, else we are
> told to when we ask for final last call.
> Aki Niemi wrote:
>> Speaking as calsify chair, I'd simply like to point out that this
>> would in any case be strictly an individual effort; XML representation
>> of iCalendar is firmly out of the scope of the calsify WG.
More information about the Ietf-calsify