[Ietf-calsify] variations and options
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Tue Nov 15 14:52:10 PST 2005
> With all of the variations and options available in iTIP
> the ABNF would be almost impossible to specify. ...
> Trying to specify all of the iTIP rules in ABNF would create
> a huge ABNF syntax table that would be difficult to verify
> as accurate.
these statements raise such a large red flag with me, i feel compelled to
bother the list about it. especially since this issue has struck me as being
a chronic issue with the calendaring work.
the more variations and options an Internet specification has, the higher
the barrier to implementation and interoperability and, therefore, to use.
why is that not a concern here?
More information about the Ietf-calsify