February 2005 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Feb 1 07:37:00 PST 2005
Ending: Mon Feb 28 08:46:09 PST 2005
Messages: 111

• [Ietf-calsify] BOF at Minneapolis IETF meeting   Cyrus Daboo
  • [Ietf-calsify] BOF at Minneapolis IETF meeting   Doug Royer
• [Ietf-calsify] Report on Calconnect Roundtable II; advance notice of Roundtable III - The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium   Dave Thewlis
• [Ietf-calsify] Jumping back into the fray, with an apology   Nathaniel Borenstein
• [Ietf-calsify] Receiver Capability Description Considered Harmful   Nathaniel Borenstein
• [Ietf-calsify] The ical version number must be bumped   Nathaniel Borenstein
• [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Nathaniel Borenstein
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Peter Saint-Andre
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cyrus Daboo
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Robert_Ransdell at notesdev.ibm.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Mark Swanson
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   pregen at egenconsulting.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Tim Hare
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   pregen at egenconsulting.com
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Tim Hare
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Libby Miller
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Mark Swanson
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cyrus Daboo
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Reinhold Kainhofer
• [Ietf-calsify] Receiver Capability Description Considered Harmful   Cameron Stillion
• [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cameron Stillion
  • [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Tantek Çelik
    • [Ietf-calsify] max-interop vs. min-useful and DTEND (Was Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?)   Tantek Çelik
      • [Ietf-calsify] max-interop vs. min-useful and DTEND (Was Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?)   Doug Royer
  • [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Mark Swanson
    • [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   pregen at egenconsulting.com
  • [Ietf-calsify] What's wrong with more radical simplification?   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cameron Stillion
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cameron Stillion
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Cameron Stillion
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Helge Hess
• [Ietf-calsify] Example RRULEs   Cyrus Daboo
  • [Ietf-calsify] Example RRULEs   Reinhold Kainhofer
    • [Ietf-calsify] Example RRULEs   Libby Miller
  • [Ietf-calsify] Example RRULEs   Jonathan Lennox
  • [Ietf-calsify] Example RRULEs   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Doug Royer
  • [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Reinhold Kainhofer
    • [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Cyrus Daboo
      • [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Doug Royer
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?   Doug Royer
• [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs   Doug Royer
• [Fwd: Re: [Ietf-calsify] EXRULE and multiple RRULEs]   Mark Swanson
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: EXRULE and multiple RRULEs - Frank Dawson store examples   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Fwd: Re: [Ietf-calsify] Re: What's wrong with more radical simplification?]   Mark Swanson
• [Ietf-calsify] Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Tim Hare
  • [Ietf-calsify] Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Doug Royer
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Michiel van Leeuwen
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Elias Sinderson
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Curt Ellmann
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Elias Sinderson
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Jonathan Lennox
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Michiel van Leeuwen
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   Michiel van Leeuwen
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Comments on radical simplification and bumping the version   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Ietf-calsify] radical simplification, too   Preston Stephenson
  • [Ietf-calsify] radical simplification, too   Doug Royer
• [Ietf-calsify] Fwd: Wild Google Speculation, but interesting   Oren Sreebny
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Tim Hare
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   pregen at egenconsulting.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Robert_Ransdell at notesdev.ibm.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   pregen at egenconsulting.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Robert_Ransdell at notesdev.ibm.com
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Keith MacDonald
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Ietf-calsify] I-D ACTION:draft-daboo-calsify-issues-00.txt (fwd)   Cyrus Daboo
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-daboo-calsify-issues-00.txt (fwd)   Michiel van Leeuwen
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-daboo-calsify-issues-00.txt (fwd)   Doug Royer
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-daboo-calsify-issues-00.txt (fwd)   Michiel van Leeuwen
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cameron Stillion
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   pregen at egenconsulting.com
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cameron Stillion
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cyrus Daboo
    • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Libby Miller
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cyrus Daboo
      • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Doug Royer
• [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cameron Stillion
  • [Ietf-calsify] Re: Google Speculation, but interesting   Cyrus Daboo

Last message date: Mon Feb 28 08:46:09 PST 2005
Archived on: Mon Feb 28 08:46:12 PST 2005

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...