[Ietf-calsify] Re: [Ietf-caldav] xCal - resubmitted.
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Aug 9 07:29:07 PDT 2005
Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:08 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>Copies of the draft at:
>>Just two quick formal comments...:
>>1) Is it intentional that in the examples, the iCalendar container
>>element is in no namespace?
>>2) I don't think the IETF will let you use something like
>>"http://ietf.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt" as namespace name;
> Right; I gather Best Current Practice is...
> If the registrant wishes to
> have a URI assigned, then a URN of the form
> will be assigned where <class> is the type of the document being
> registered (see below).
> -- http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3688.html
One could probably also use: <urn:ietf:rfc:NNNN> (see
Best regards, Julian
More information about the Ietf-calsify