[Ietf-calsify] Re: DURATION and PERIOD - proposal
Reinhold Kainhofer
reinhold at kainhofer.com
Fri Apr 15 12:29:10 PDT 2005
Am Freitag, 15. April 2005 20:55 schrieb Doug Royer:
> Which is why I showed converting it back to the users local time zone.
>
> And it matches what the user expected.
>
> Show an example that fails when you do the conversion to UTC, then
> the duration math, then the conversion back to the TZID.
Take an event in CET (DST starts on March 27, 2005) that starts at 01:30 CET
on March 27 and lasts one day. The user expects this to end at 01:30 CEST on
March 28.
Now do the math in UTC. The event starts at 00:30 UTC on March 27 and so ends
at 00:30 UTC on March 28. That time, however, is 02:30 in the user's new time
zone. So in this option, the event ends at 02:30 CEST on March 28, while the
user expects it to end at 01:30.
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna, Austria
email: reinhold at kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org/, KOrganizer / KPilot maintainer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-calsify/attachments/20050415/58091c7d/attachment.bin
More information about the Ietf-calsify
mailing list