[Ietf-calsify] Help needed -- questionnaire on implementationof Recurrence Rules -- Calconnect and Calsify

Dave Thewlis Dave.Thewlis at calconnect.org
Sun Apr 3 15:50:06 PDT 2005


I made it "YES" "NO" and "OTHER" which amounts to the same thing.  Now 
up on the site. 

Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> Hi Cameron,
>
> --On April 3, 2005 11:50:44 -0700 Cameron Stillion 
> <camerost at exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Just one little bug - or rather niggly - is that it is rather difficult
>> in an HTML form to deselect all options in a set of radio buttons,
>> therefore the approach of "don't select either" is somewhat problematic
>> in the cases where you may have already chosen one (for whatever reason)
>> - without completely resetting the form to try again. :)
>>
>
> Right - I think what we need is a three-state choice: 'yes', 'no', 
> 'n/a' (not applicable for whatever reason - e.g. question about iTIP 
> but product does not implement iTIP at all).
>


More information about the Ietf-calsify mailing list