[Fwd: Re: [Ietf-calsify] possible VALARM solution?]

[TimHare at comcast.net]

Right - but _adding_  objects/components/properties takes us away from our 
simplification goal, and simplification is being discussed to improve 
interoperability.

The many pieces of CAP are there to try to accomodate almost everything 
that existing implementations do - which is a different way to accomplish 
interoperability, but not a simple one.


At 02:13 PM 9/7/04, Doug Royer wrote:


>CAP adds a LOCAL and ENABLE objects to VALARM for just that purpose




Tim Hare
Interested Bystander, Non-Inc.