[Ietf-calsify] Simplification

[Doug Royer]

Yes. I think the way to go is to split into several drafts (I do not 
care about the
order or priority at this time):

   1)  iCAL + VEVENT + VALARM
   2) VTODO
   3) VJOURNAL
   4) Time Zones
   5) iMIP
   6) Scheduling


Nathaniel Borenstein wrote:

> We're in violent agreement.  In particular, I haven't heard *anyone* 
> say that the iCal model or format is hopeless, but I've heard just 
> about *everyone* say that it's overly complex.  Hence my (consciously 
> extreme) default position, which is that we should get rid of every 
> feature and option that we can live without, and add nothing unless it 
> enables a larger simplification.  -- Nathaniel


-- 

Doug Royer                     |   http://INET-Consulting.com
-------------------------------|-----------------------------
Doug at Royer.com                 | Office: (208)520-4044
http://Royer.com/People/Doug   | Fax:    (866)594-8574
                               | Cell:   (208)520-4044

              We Do Standards - You Need Standards


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4696 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-calsify/attachments/20040825/97d3b8b3/smime-0001.bin