[Ietf-calsify] Just for the record. Notes has a full implementationof VTODOs

[Dan Winship]

On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 12:27 -0700, Cameron Stillion wrote:
> I realize there are actually a few vendors out there who have actually
> put the time and effort into implementing VTODO from the previously
> proposed standard.  I question whether this investment was made in
> response to users clamoring for more task-management features from
> calendaring systems, or if it was done simply because it happens to be
> in the spec.  I know of no web sites that publish task lists using this
> mechanism, no clients that even propose to interoperate in this way.

Lots of clients and servers that were written post-2445 use VTODO as
their native task data format (eg Evolution, Apple's iCal) and some
actually even do VTODO-over-iMIP and such. I think we should probably
keep VTODO, though maybe in a separate document as Doug suggested. (And
I also agree with your later post, that it really seems like some of the
existing VTODO features were just copied over from VEVENT "because we
can", and should be rethought.)

-- Dan