[Ietf-calsify] Recommendations for stripping down iCal toa
manageable 'standard'
Cameron Stillion
camerost at exchange.microsoft.com
Tue Aug 17 13:10:03 PDT 2004
I'd love to see a property for all-day events, but that implies adding
to our standard. Perhaps there's an x- prop that we can encourage use
of? A boolean property makes more sense to me than specifying midnight
to midnight or a time range of zero. It is resilient to time zone
calculations.
Does anyone else feel strongly about all-day events?
Cam
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-calsify-bounces at osafoundation.org
[mailto:ietf-calsify-bounces at osafoundation.org] On Behalf Of Preston
Stephenson
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:35 AM
To: ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf-calsify] Recommendations for stripping down iCal toa
manageable 'standard'
>1.1) Limit Schema Support
>
>As a non-goal, I suggest that our purpose is NOT to define a schema
for
>all types of PIM data - specifically, journal items, task items,
etc.
>Other data types like those mentioned should be specified in OTHER
>standards. This means removing VJOURNAL and VTODO from this
document.
Do you think it will add too much complexity to support VJOURNAL and
VTODO?
They are usually simpler than VEVENT's.
It wouldn't seem that more difficult to support all three.
Are we going to come up with a definition of an all-day event?
I've seen it handled multiple ways.
Thanks.
Preston
_______________________________________________
Ietf-calsify mailing list
Ietf-calsify at osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-calsify
More information about the Ietf-calsify
mailing list