[Ietf-caldav] MKCALENDAR or extended MKCOL

[Bernard Desruisseaux]

Hi Arnaud,

We don't want draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched to depend on 
draft-daboo-webdav-mkcol.

When draft-daboo-webdav-mkcol will be published it will update both 
RFC4791 (CalDAV calendar-access) as well as CalDAV Scheduling 
(calendar-auto-schedule).

Cheers,
Bernard

Arnaud Quillaud wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The new scheduling draft still makes use of MKCALENDAR to create 
> scheduling enabled calendar collections 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-05#section-3.1.1). 
> 
> Moreover, it changes its semantic since the default behavior is now to 
> create a scheduling enabled collection.
> 
> Shouldn't we instead leverage the extended mkcol 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daboo-webdav-mkcol) ?
> 
> Arnaud Q
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-caldav mailing list -- Ietf-caldav at osafoundation.org
> See http://ietf.webdav.org/caldav/ for more CalDAV resources
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-caldav
>