[Ietf-caldav] draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-04 PROPPATCH
Gren.Elliot at scalix.com
Mon Jan 7 07:07:02 PST 2008
draft-desruisseaux-caldav-sched-04 Section 5.3.2 Additional
Precondition for PROPPATCH
says the precondition is :
(CALDAV:valid-free-busy-set): One or more resources referenced in
a CALDAV:calendar-free-busy-set property being stored on a
scheduling Inbox collection is invalid.
Should the "invalid" read "valid"? I can understand that some of the
resources might be invalid due to calendar deletions or future additions
but requiring one to be invalid seems wrong.
More information about the Ietf-caldav