[Ietf-caldav] Fwd: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis

[Helge Hess]

On 24. Dez 2005, at 01:31 Uhr, Mike Shaver wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Apache simply has decided that multiple updates within one second  
>> *are*
>> semantically equivalent.
>
> Do you mean to indicate that such a decision on the part of Apache is
> reasonable, given the requirements of the HTTP specification?  It
> certainly doesn't seem that way to me, but I am probably the biggest
> HTTP dullard on this list, so I'm happy to learn.

Maybe I'm wrong but if I understood Julian correctly Apache will  
ensure that there will be only one PUT in the timeframe of 1s. If the  
server ensures that, a timestamp with 1s granularity should be enough  
for an etag?

Greets,
   Helge
-- 
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org