[General] Re: Planning and Notes Wiki Areas

[Ted Leung]

On Mar 30, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> From a Product Planning perspective, the Standalone Chandler Server  
> product will probably eventually look very different from the  
> Chandler Hub product. For example, what is currently the Account  
> Browser may get a UI overhaul aimed at people running home servers  
> or servers for small companies, etc. But Chandler Hub users may  
> never see/use the Account Browser.
>
> Even today, we have some competing use cases around the various  
> URLs users can access/hand out from the end-user UI. Anyhow, we  
> don't need to have that section in the Planning area just yet,  
> since there isn't anything to put there...but the Planning and  
> Product Areas are technically organized by Product...and we've  
> talked about how eventually Chandler Server will be it's own  
> product. But I may be jumping the gun on this one.

Ok, well I guess I don't see us having two separate versions of the  
code for Chandler Server, which is ultimately where that leads.  But  
we can talk about that after Preview.


>>>
>>> + I've also added quicklinks in the right-hand sidebar to PPD  
>>> Contributor Notes and Active Specs / Projects (e.g. Branding)
>>>
>>> =====
>>>
>>> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/NotesArea
>>> + I've taken a few choice links from the Journal WebHome: Events,  
>>> Mailing list stuff and IRC
>>
>> The events page is totally out of date
>
> Yup, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter?

Pieter

>> The names of some mailing lists are unclear.  We don't have list  
>> named 'dev'.  It's called 'chandler-dev'.  Same for 'cosmo', it's  
>> 'cosmo-dev'
>> I think we should drop the IRC office hours pages.  We don't  
>> really have them any more, it's a vestigial reference.
>>
>
> Yup, again, who can I pass the buck to? Pieter?

I'll do these.

>>> + The meetings notes that used to live in Journal will live under  
>>> Teams in the new taxonomy
>>>
>>> + I've also added quicklinks to the various TEAM pages in the  
>>> right-hand sidebar.
>>>
>>> Is there anything else that should go in the Notes Area?
>>>
>>> To recap the new Notes Area is meant to be a Sandbox area for  
>>> contributors...basically all the 'unofficial' stuff. The meeting  
>>> notes are actually kind of official...and also belong under Teams.
>>
>> The top of the page says home of all things un-official.  Does  
>> that mean this is also a place for anyone to put up journal pages  
>> or is it restricted to staff/interns/SoC folks?
>>
>
> There are community member pages in there as well. Not sure if we  
> want to draw a line between staff and community. We haven't until now.

I think it should stay the same.

>>>
>>> *ATTENTION* Each of the Teams pages should link in the right-hand  
>>> sidebar to the Contributor Notes page of all team members. Please  
>>> side right-hand sidebar of the PPD Team page: http:// 
>>> wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DesignGroup
>>
>> So is it time for me to start working on the Cosmo Team page?  I  
>> haven't done anything with it.
>>
>
> Yaaa. Please.

Just change my job description to Wiki Gardener...   Ok, I'll take a  
look.

Ted
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20070330/169d3a2a/attachment.htm