[General] [Proposal] Rationalizing our Downloads pages

[Mimi Yin]

Hi Grant,

I agree that the DesktopSource page could be cleaned up a bit, though  
I feel I'm not the best person to do that. Katie/Ted, is this part of  
your Developers Wiki efforts?

I think though the terminology will necessarily be different for end- 
users versus Developers. Developers distinguish between the two. End- 
users probably shouldn't think too objectively about this kind of  
stuff. I always find it weird when I'm reading end-user agreements  
and what-not. Feels like someone is watching me. (Or...maybe I'm  
misunderstanding what your terminology comment was about.)

Mimi

On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:

> Delicious!
>
> My one issue -- and I think it's probably not a big deal -- is that  
> we have a red double-outlined box on ChandlerDesktopSource saying  
> that the latest official Chandler release is “Release 0.6.1,  
> 2006-02-08”. Should I consider this an incentive to get Preview out  
> the door :) ?
>
> In any case, maybe the terminology in the two pages (Releases/ 
> Milestones/Continuous vs Latest/At-Your-Own-Risk) could be synced  
> or x-referenced better?
>
> --Grant
>
> On 12 Jul, 2007, at 10:58, Mimi Yin wrote:
>
>> I've pulled together 2 sets of Download pages with some help from  
>> Bear :)
>>
>> Downloading Chandler Desktop and Building Chandler Desktop from  
>> the Source Code
>> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerDesktop
>> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerDesktopSource
>>
>> Downloading Chandler Server and Building Chandler Server from the  
>> Source Code
>> http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerServer
>> http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerServerSource
>>
>> I'd like to move all download links to the Developers Wiki except  
>> for Download Chandler Desktop, which should live in the recently  
>> deprecated Projects Wiki and display as chandlerproject.org/ 
>> download (as per the URL plan Jared and I worked out.)
>>
>> Does anyone see any issues with this proposal?
>>
>> Mimi
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general