[General] Relicensing of Chandler source code

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 06:05 PM 5/2/2006 -0700, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>If we use the apache 2.0 license, which is incompatible with the GPL,
>wouldn't we then be restricting parcel developers from using the GPL
>if they did wish to do so?

Why would Chandler's (non-viral) license stop anyone from licensing their 
parcel under whatever license they want?  (Including a closed-source 
commercial license, if they so choose.)