[General] Re: [Chandler-dev] Milestone and general naming, terminology

[Priscilla Chung]

+1 to basic numbering schemes! (As a less-technical person, I have  
had difficulty understanding what all the labeling means.) -Priscilla

On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:

> As a build/release person I can't tell you how hard/horrible/sad  
> (pick any one of them) it is to deal with projects that use more  
> than the basic 0.7.1 numbering scheme.
>
> As Phillip points out, the marketing label can be anything.  I feel  
> strongly that we should get back to basic numbering.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20060829/0c62cb33/attachment.htm