[Dev] Re: [Cosmo] Apple iCal & cosmo-demo

[Morgen Sagen]

I don't think Chandler should assume that there will be a port 80  
('http') server along with the port 443 ('https') server, and that  
they both refer to the same Cosmo instance.  I'm not sure how  
Chandler could know this in a general way, without having site- 
specific logic (in other words, "if host == 'cosmo-demo' then port  
443 is equivalent to 80") inside Chandler.  It's perhaps unusual that  
cosmo-demo is set up this way, and I wouldn't count on it.  I would  
be interested to hear what other people think.

On Mar 6, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:

> So it seems like we do need to spit out a separate URL for iCal  
> users? Morgen?
>
> Mimi
>
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
>
>> Yup. Me too. So I deleted the 'S' in HTTPS and it worked. -Priscilla
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
>>
>>> I had trouble too.
>>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just discovered that Apple iCal doesn't support HTTPS, which  
>>>> means it won't work with our https://cosmo- 
>>>> demo.osafoundation.org/ server.  I guess when we tested this  
>>>> earlier we weren't using HTTPS (or else iCal stopped supporting  
>>>> HTTPS).  Is this something we should address?  It's a shame to  
>>>> go through all this work to allow non-Chandler clients to  
>>>> interoperate with us, and then have it not work.