[Dev] terminology change: content model --> domain model

[Alec Flett]

Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> In the architecture document, I used the term "domain model" instead 
> of "content model". This layer defines the domain specific schema: 
> calendar events, email messages, tasks, contacts, etc. The term 
> "content model" was OSAF specific. I strongly prefer "domain model" 
> because that is a more standard term.
>
> http://chandler.osafoundation.org/docs/0.6/overview.html
>
> Before I go do a bunch of wiki gardening and initiate any code 
> changes, I thought I'd do a sanity check. Do folks agree with this 
> terminology change? Please respond by Wednesday morning.
>
+1, or maybe +10 :)

I always though "content model" was confusing - especially since the DOM 
in a web page is also often referred to as a content model. It took me a 
few weeks at OSAF to realize that the "content model" didn't necessarily 
include the block API :)

Alec
> Cheers,
> Katie
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev