[Dev] Re: Chandler 0.6 download metrics - fixed a bug
Pieter Hartsook
hartsook at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 11 08:59:58 PST 2006
Bear,
This looks better, but I also find suspicious the number of downloads
of 0.4and earlier versions on all platforms, but especially on the
Mac. How are
people finding those links, why are they downloading 1-2 yr. old versions of
the product? If these numbers are script artifacts, maybe we could fix that
too? If they really are legit downloads, maybe we should make getting those
older versions more difficult and try to direct folks to the current
version.
Also, it might be good to start a new download table for 2006 with just the
current versions on the wiki page so you don't have to wade through so much
old data to see what's happening.
Thanks for doing this.
Pieter
On 1/10/06, Mike Taylor <bear at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
> After a number of people have given me a "hmm, now those numbers just
> seem *wrong*" comment on the Chandler 0.6 download figures (see
> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/
> QuantitativeCommunityInvolvementMetrics#Downloads ) I finally got a
> chance to take a look at the script and have found the bug.
>
> Basically windows downloads were being under-counted - I've correct the
> bug and have re-run last week's numbers.
>
> I'll be tweaking the script to try and re-run the previous weeks values
> for 0.6
>
> ---
> Bear
>
> Build and Release Engineer
> Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
> bear at osafoundation.org
> http://www.osafoundation.org
>
> bear at code-bear.com
> http://code-bear.com
>
> PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20060111/e24104f1/attachment.html
More information about the Dev
mailing list