[Dev] Subversion directory structuring

Philippe Bossut pbossut at osafoundation.org
Wed Feb 22 16:51:39 PST 2006


Sorry to be thick but the semantic difference between "tags" and 
"branches" is really lost on me, especially using SVN since there's no 
real differences between the 2...

So, why can't we have:
chandler/
    branches/
        0.6/
        release-0.6/

IOW, what do we gain by adding one extra bifurcation in the tree?

I infer from the threads that "tags" are "non modifiable" but is that 
something actively enforced or just a convention we decided to adopt?

Cheers,
- Philippe

Mike Taylor wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
>
>> Mike Taylor wrote:
>>> What I see that needs to change to support Heikki's proposal is that I
>>> would create the 0.6 branch/tag in the tags directory:
>>>
>>> chandler/
>>>     tags/
>>>         0.6/
>>
>> Yeah, this is my preference. Alternatively
>>
>> chandler/
>>     tags/
>>         release-0.6/
>>
>> to make it really clear.
>
> This would also bring Chandler in line with Cosmo and Scooby - so for 
> me this gets a +1
>
> ---
> Bear
>
> Build and Release Engineer
> Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
> bear at osafoundation.org
> http://www.osafoundation.org
>
> bear at code-bear.com
> http://code-bear.com
>
> PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>   


More information about the Dev mailing list