[Dev] [havefix] status whiteboard convention

[Philippe Bossut]

+1 on this

Note however that I don't think it should ever be a keyword: keyword are 
meant to characterize (tag) bugs, not for tem status. [havefix] is 
definitely a temporary status and should be in the whiteboard status 
(something erasable).
Note for people using [SWAG] that when you have a [havefix], you can 
typically clean up the whiteboard of the previous [SWAG]
Cheers,
- Philippe

Heikki Toivonen wrote:

>We have a bunch of bugs that have fixes in local trees, attached
>patches, branches, or in external or internal but that have not made it
>to the make install build (which is the canonical build from which we
>get releases, test, etc.)
>
>The bug council is finding it useful to have this status readily
>available, and we'd like to experiment with having [havefix] in the
>status whiteboard for those bugs mentioned above. We may make that into
>a keyword at a later date.
>
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
>Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
>http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>  
>