[Dev] ContentModel, Calendar, Contacts,
etc. reorganization/flattening
Katie Capps Parlante
capps at osafoundation.org
Thu Jul 28 11:49:06 PDT 2005
For context when making suggestions, there's a rough before/after
picture here:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/ParcelFlatteningProposal
'pim' is intended to be the location for pim related schema -- more
concise than 'contentmodel'. :) Alec, are you arguing that the modules
defining the pim schema should live in one big package with everything else?
Cheers,
Katie
Alec Flett wrote:
> On a related note, why osaf.pim? why not just "chandler"? I'm guessing
> the argument is that you could reuse these objects outside of chandler,
> which seems nice.. though even the osaf prefix seems superfluous to me..
>
> So on a related note, I'd like to propose some future renames after
> you're done with this one
> (and maybe you've already thought about this)
>
> osaf.views.main -> chandler (in this case, this really is the chandler
> product)
> osaf.framework.blocks -> cpia or cpia.blocks (break cpia out from being
> a chandler-only thing)
> osaf.framework.attributeEditors -> cpia.attributeEditors (or
> cpia.attributeeditors?)
> osaf.framework.twisted -> chandler.twisted
> osaf.framework.scripting -> cpia.script
> osaf.app -> chandler
More information about the Dev
mailing list