[Dev] ContentModel, Calendar, Contacts, etc. reorganization/flattening

[Grant Baillie]

On Jul 28, 2005, at 11:09 , Heikki Toivonen wrote:

>> On a related note, why osaf.pim? why not just "chandler"? I'm  
>> guessing
>> the argument is that you could reuse these objects outside of  
>> chandler,
>> which seems nice.. though even the osaf prefix seems superfluous  
>> to me..
>>
>
> I don't like chandler for that, because then many people would have 3
> nested chandler directories:
>
> cd ~
> mkdir chandler
> cd chandler         # my workdir
> svn co ... chandler
> cd chandler         # svn chandler dir
> cd chandler         # current osaf dir
>
> Oh, there's also chandler SVN repository. I'd go crazy...

Me, too :). Also, in projects I've worked on in the past, code names  
(like "Chandler") have waxed and waned over time, and obsolete code  
names are confusing.

--Grant