[Dev] 0.7 perf goals

[Ted Leung]

On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:47 AM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:

> Heikki Toivonen wrote:
>> There are a couple of approaches we could take. One is to  
>> concentrate on
>> the cases that are furthest from our 0.6 goals. The other is to  
>> take a
>> broad look and work on all the cases that are not yet under the ideal
>> limits. In the first case our numeric goals would remain  
>> unchanged. In
>> the second case we would set new, tighter goals for the cases that  
>> did
>> make it under acceptable limits but are not yet under ideal limits.
>> Personally I am in favor of the latter. I have some initial  
>> suggestions
>> here:
>> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/ 
>> ZeroSevenPerfGoals20051204
>
> Another approach we could take is to increase the size of the  
> collections (and repository) that we expect to handle. Instead of a  
> 3000 item calendar, we could say a 10,000 item repository, with  
> several collections/calendars. Nailing down the tenets might help  
> us pick a good target, but the general goal here would be to  
> ratchet up the size of the repository. We could combine this with  
> focus on a specific set of cases and/or ratcheting down the  
> response times.

I agree that we need to start using repository sizes that are closer  
to what we might see in 1.0.   10,000 items is a start in that  
direction.

----
Ted Leung                 Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
PGP Fingerprint: 1003 7870 251F FA71 A59A  CEE3 BEBA 2B87 F5FC 4B42