[Dev] 0.7 perf goals

[Heikki Toivonen]

Alec Flett wrote:
> I think a key component to avoid regressions is going to be getting
> historical performance graphs - as they say, pictures speak louder than
> words. (kidding) - but in all seriousness: I think we're not going to be
> able to spot performance regressions if we're just looking at a graph of
> today's performance numbers (which is what we have now) - I think we
> need to look back at least 30 days and see if there has been a gradual
> and/or sudden regression in numbers and the fastest way to do this is
> with a graph.

Yup, we have a bug on that. However, I also think that regressions that
are large enough to notice immediately after checkin can and should be
noticed and addressed in some manner that same day.

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20051206/ef9b1d91/signature.pgp