[Dev] 0.7 perf goals

[Heikki Toivonen]

Andi Vajda wrote:
> I think it's still too early in the Chandler release cycle to run the

Since some others echoed this it seems clear we will go with the case by
case method.

> improvement. For instance, most of the performance tests used in 0.6 are
> too far from end user 'reality' to make regressions an auto-backed out
> showstopper. A goal for 0.7 in the performance tracking area should be
> to have more tests reflecting real end-user situations.

That's a little vague. What would you change, explicitly?

The issue of using backed out repository and restoring from there so
that we load items from disk is a known issue and I am working on it -
hopefully I can get it done by the end of the week (a couple of tests
are failing in that mode and there is a possible state leakage between
tests).

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20051206/1af9e0c0/signature.pgp