[Dev] DRAFT: Python Schema API proposal
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Apr 15 15:50:36 PDT 2005
At 03:21 PM 4/15/05 -0700, John Anderson wrote:
>I've probably written as much parcel XML as anyone, and don't particularly
>like it, however, the vast majority of the parcel xml I've written turns
>out to be creating instances, not creating schema, so I'm much more
>concerned about how you intend to improve creating instances that populate
>the repository during parcel loading when Chandler isn't running. I almost
>never create new items programatically after the repository is populated,
>instead I just make copies of existing items in the repository, so I also
>don't care too much about the syntax of Item construction when Chandler is
>running.
As I understand my charter for 0.6 from Katie and Lisa, I'm to focus on
schema definition first. I think that they'd like to see more of Alec's
ideas for a CPIA-specific XML dialect before moving away from XML
altogether for item instances. But of course I'm sure they can speak more
to that point than I can.
As far as I understand from Andi, however, none of the features he's done
are restricted to schema items, and in fact if I understand his new
Citem.COPYEXPORT correctly it might be able to help with the trunk copying
stuff in the future as well.
More information about the Dev
mailing list