[Dev] logging proposal

[Kapil Thangavelu]

Hi Katie,

On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:24 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> Hi Kapil,
> 
> I think we are all in agreement that we like your proposal and would 
> basically like to go ahead with it.
> 

great

> We still have to resolve the logging hierarchy. The first step here is 
> probably to look at the current parcel hierarchy for where it may need 
> to be refactored (we have a few messes to clean up). I think we do want 
> the logging hierarchy to reflect the parcel hierarchy, although perhaps 
> only the "top level" parcels to avoid a deeply nested logging hierarchy.
> 

sounds good.

> It would be great to do both of these things (rationalization of the 
> parcel hierarchy and a logging framework) for our 0.5 release -- its a 
> bit late to get new work into the 0.4 release. We're going to be 
> spending the next month wrapping up the 0.4 release and planning the 0.5 
> release, btw.
> 

ok

> Are you up for implementing your proposal? I'm adding the task of 
> rationalizing the parcel hierarchy to my plate, early in the 0.5 cycle.
> 

sure, i'm up for implementation. probably third week of october.

-kapil

> Cheers,
> Katie
> 
> Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> 
> > hi folks,
> > 
> > i put together a logging proposal, about unifying the logging  
> > configuration and usage within chandler,
> > 
> > http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Chandler/ AlternativeLoggingProposal
> > 
> > the structure of the logging hierarchy is a big open question..
> > 
> > cheers,
> > 
> > Kapil Thangavelu <hazmat at objectrealms.net>       Vision Implemented
> > objectrealms.net <http://www.objectrealms.net>
> > 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20040930/dc7a34cb/attachment.bin