[Dev] Re: refcounted

[Morgen Sagen]

I also agree that we should just have the repository default to the new 
refcounted mode.

On Oct 25, 2004, at 6:59 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> I'm tending to agree with John here.  What's the cost to keeping the 
> refcounted and non-refcounted modes?  Are we going to test both modes? 
>  apply fixes to both modes?  document, etc?  Unused code goes stale 
> quickly.
>
> Lisa
>
> On Oct 24, 2004, at 6:36 PM, John Anderson wrote:
>
>> I already did that -- that wasn't my point. I was suggesting removing 
>> the refcounted kwd since I can't think of any reason you'd want to 
>> use the repository non ref counted -- and if you can think of a 
>> reason, the kwd should be nonrefcounded so no kwd is ref counted 
>> (i.e. a sensable default)
>>
>> Andi Vajda wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You're welcome to turn it on in application/Application.py, line 207.
>>> Same applies to the -exclusive option, line 206, the app needs to 
>>> decide what it wants to do there as well.
>>>
>>> Andi..
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, John Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andi:
>>>>
>>>> Now that we have the refcounted option in the repository, I'd vote 
>>>> for making it the default and eliminating the option of 
>>>> non-refcounting altogether -- unless you can think of any advantage 
>>>> of non-refcounting.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev